
Take a look at our newest merchandise
Starmer suggests tighter guidelines for teenagers on social media may embody restrictions on ‘doomscrolling’
At his occasion this morning Keir Starmer made it clear that the legal guidelines on how teenagers entry social media will certainly be tightened. However he stated he was “open-minded” about whether or not this would come with a full, Austalian-style ban.
Starmer recommended that one possibility will probably be to restrict the expertise that enables “doomscrolling”. He stated:
We’ve taken the powers to ensure we are able to act inside months, not years.
We additionally have to act in a short time, not simply of the age concern, however on the gadgets and purposes that make the type of auto-scrolling, the fixed glueing to the machine which you can by no means cease scrolling.
In a publish on his Substack account, Starmer stated out in additional particulars the choices that might be applied because of the session being carried out. He stated:
We will probably be going to parliament for brand new authorities powers, enabling us to behave on the findings of the social media session the place the proof suggests we have to. This might embody:
-Setting a minimal age restrict for social media: not like the Tories, who took years to cross the On-line Security Act, we are going to take powers that might enable us to implement a minimal age for social media in a matter of months to stop children from accessing dangerous social media.
-Proscribing particular functionalities: which can be detrimental to children’ wellbeing and preserve them hooked to their screens like limitless scroll or autoplay
-Limiting VPN entry for youths:
to make it tougher for youths to get round age limits of companies or sure functionalities.That is all designed to place the wellbeing of youngsters first.
Key occasions
Q: If issues are going so effectively, why did you nearly lose your job?
Starmer says he’s indignant that he was lied to by Peter Mandelson about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. He says he has apologised for that.
Q: However, earlier than you appointed him ambassador, you knew that he had stayed in Epstein’s home after Epstein had been convicted. It was within the FT.
Starmer says Mandelson was requested about that. He gave a solution that was “not truthful”. He says he can’t disclose the small print as a result of there’s a police investigation happening.
Q: What do you remorse most about your time in workplace?
Starmer says he desires to deal with issues which have gone effectively.
Some issues which have gone very proper for the federal government. Ready lists are down. Rates of interest are down for anyone on mortgage. That’s a large step in the best route. Inflation is coming again right down to 2%. We’re now main on the worldwide stage.
Vine repeats the declare about contemplating a social media ban for under-16s amounting to a U-turn.
Starmer says what issues is to get this proper.
He says there aren’t any straightforward solutions on this. He’s a “pragmatist”, he says.
Vine begins by asking about social media and youngsters.
Starmer begins by repeating the factors that he made at this occasion earlier; that he is aware of mother and father have considerations; that the federal government intends to behave, and act, shortly as soon as its three-month session is over; and that this might result in a ban on under-16s accessing social media, however that this isn’t the one possibility, as a result of different, extra particular restrictions, is perhaps preferable.
Q: Lisa Nandy used to say you weren’t contemplating a ban. So is that this one other U-turn?
Starmer says he doesn’t settle for that.
He says a ban is “a risk”.
However it isn’t the one possibility, he says.
He quotes the considerations of the NSPCC a couple of complete ban. (See 12.05pm.)
Starmer interviewed by Jeremy Vine on Radio 2
Keir Starmer is now being interview on Radio 2 by Jeremy Vine.
You possibly can hear right here.
Starmer says social media has turn into one thing ‘harming our youngsters’
Keir Starmer’s new publish on his Substack account additionally incorporates an express assertion staying saying social media is harming our youngsters. This isn’t stunning; the federal government wouldn’t be tightening the foundations on youngsters and younger youngsters accessing social media it didn’t settle for it’s inflicting issues. However this isn’t one thing that ministers usually specific this bluntly.
Starmer stated:
When Fb first launched in 2004, it was a fairly easy idea. Make a profile, publish updates that folks may have a look at within the order they have been posted, like and touch upon what your folks needed to say.
That may be a world away from the algorithms, limitless scrolling, For You pages and personal chats that make up the fashionable world of social media. Previously 20+ years, social media has advanced to turn into one thing utterly completely different from the straightforward, stripped-back pages it was in its conception.
And in that evolution, it has turn into one thing that’s quietly harming our youngsters. A hurt that, as a result of inaction of earlier Tory governments, we’re permitting to occur.
(Whereas Starmer is true to say that it is a downside that developed whereas the Conservatives have been in energy – the iPhone had solely simply been invented when the final Labour authorities left workplace, youngsters didn’t have smartphones and Instagram and TikTok didn’t even exist – it’s probaby unfair of him responsible “Tory inaction”. The Labour occasion was not warning concerning the dangers of social media on the time both.)
In her interviews this morning Liz Kendall, the expertise secretary, stated that organisations just like the NSPCC have been amongst these saying that particular restrictions on teenagers utilizing social media is perhaps extra useful than a blanket ban on under-16s utilizing it, as has been applied in Australia. (See 9.32am.) Keir Starmer subsequently adopted this line at his occasion this morning, saying the federal government’s session wouldn’t essentially result in a full ban. (See 10.40am and 11.55am.)
In its information launch at the moment, the federal government quotes Chris Sherwood, the CEO of the NSPCC, making this level. Sherwood stated;
We welcome the prime minister’s promise to behave shortly and decisively to carry tech firms to account and make the web world safer for youngsters. The established order can’t proceed, and with out actual change the strain for an beneath‑16 social media ban will solely improve.
A lot of what’s being proposed mirrors what we’ve got been urgent for: correct age‑restrict enforcement, an finish to addictive design, and stronger motion from platforms, gadgets, and AI instruments to cease dangerous content material on the supply. Delivered swiftly, these measures would supply much better safety than a blanket ban.
Starmer suggests tighter guidelines for teenagers on social media may embody restrictions on ‘doomscrolling’
At his occasion this morning Keir Starmer made it clear that the legal guidelines on how teenagers entry social media will certainly be tightened. However he stated he was “open-minded” about whether or not this would come with a full, Austalian-style ban.
Starmer recommended that one possibility will probably be to restrict the expertise that enables “doomscrolling”. He stated:
We’ve taken the powers to ensure we are able to act inside months, not years.
We additionally have to act in a short time, not simply of the age concern, however on the gadgets and purposes that make the type of auto-scrolling, the fixed glueing to the machine which you can by no means cease scrolling.
In a publish on his Substack account, Starmer stated out in additional particulars the choices that might be applied because of the session being carried out. He stated:
We will probably be going to parliament for brand new authorities powers, enabling us to behave on the findings of the social media session the place the proof suggests we have to. This might embody:
-Setting a minimal age restrict for social media: not like the Tories, who took years to cross the On-line Security Act, we are going to take powers that might enable us to implement a minimal age for social media in a matter of months to stop children from accessing dangerous social media.
-Proscribing particular functionalities: which can be detrimental to children’ wellbeing and preserve them hooked to their screens like limitless scroll or autoplay
-Limiting VPN entry for youths:
to make it tougher for youths to get round age limits of companies or sure functionalities.That is all designed to place the wellbeing of youngsters first.
Starmer says he desires to ‘go quicker’ on elevating defence spending, in response to report saying he desires it at 3% of GDP by 2029
In his Q&A with journalists, Keir Starmer was additionally requested to reply to a report by the BBC’s James Landale saying he’s plans to lift defence spending to three% of GDP by the top of this parliament. Previously Starmer has simply stated that he want to do that sooner or later within the subsequent parliament.
In his reply, Starmer stated that on the Munich Safety Convention over the weekend he was arguing that the UK, and Europe as a complete, must “step up”.
He stated the menace from Russia was “apparent”. He went on:
We wish a simply and lasting peace, however that won’t extinguish the Russian menace, and we must be alert to that, as a result of that’s going to have an effect on each single individual on this room, each single individual on this nation, so we have to step up.
Meaning, on defence spending, we have to go quicker.
We’ve clearly made commitments already in relation to that. However it goes past simply how a lot you spend, it’s additionally whether or not you coordinate and collaborate with different like-minded nations, notably in Europe.
Starmer didn’t immediately deal with the report saying he’s elevating defence spending to three% of GDP by 2029 – though he was particularly requested to by the reporter asking his query. However he did say he wished to “go quicker” on defence spending, which implied that the BBC report is heading in the right direction.
Starmer ended his reply saying that, on bettering Nato’s defence functionality, he was “completely decided the UK will present the management that’s mandatory”.
Starmer says Labour Collectively probe into journalists ‘completely must be seemed into’
Q: Do you assist in inquiry into Labour Collectively commissioning an investigation into journalists?
Starmer says there will probably be a Cupboard Workplace investigation into this. “And fairly proper too,” he provides.
He says he didn’t know something about this. It “completely must be seemed into”, he says.
Starmer says authorities will tighten guidelines on teenagers and social-media, however is ‘open-minded’ about case for Australian-style ban
Starmer is now taking questions from the media.
Q: What’s your intestine view on a ban on social media for under-16s? At one level it appeared unlikely.
Starmer says the federal government wants to maneuver “at pace”.
The On-line Security Act is sweet laws, but it surely took eight years.
He received’t wait that lengthy.
He says the session will certainly result in motion. And it will likely be launched shortly.
He says he’s “open-minded”. He can see the argument for a ban, and the argument for a extra restrictive, content-based method, that might enable youngsters to hold on seeing some content material, like information.
However there will probably be motion.
Starmer denounces Grok for permitting its customers to create photographs digitally undressing folks.
When the federal government first complained, Grok simply made {that a} premium service.
The federal government fought them on that, he says.
Starmer says no matter session on social media ban for under-16s decides needs to be applied shortly
Q: How will younger folks be concerned within the session on social media?
Starmer says younger folks will probably be concerned on this. That’s essential.
He says there are sturdy views on a social media ban for under-16s. Some folks desire a ban; some folks have considerations about it.
However he says the federal government has to take some motion shortly. It can’t let this go on for years and years, he says.
Starmer went on to focus on the social media proposals introduced at the moment. (See 9.32am.) He says this is a matter that worries all mother and father.
He’s now taking questions from member of the general public and professonals invited to the occasion.
Q: Given you might be giving 16-year-olds the vote, what provisions will you place in place to make sure youngsters have the knowledge they want.
Starmer says he’s a “massive advocate” of votes at 16. He says younger folks ought to have a say in politics.
Firstly, I’m an enormous advocate of votes at 16 and 17. At 16 and 17, you might be sufficiently old, mature sufficient to decide a couple of authorities that you just wish to be. We do want to ensure the citizenship is a part of what we have a look at. We’ve broadened the curriculum in colleges as a result of I feel youngsters and younger folks should study citizenship and the way we function the society extra usually, crucial abilities they should study.
I’m aware of your level about information, as a result of in politics, there’s at all times been a heavy type of deal with newspapers, however frankly, I don’t suppose many individuals and younger folks definitely ever learn newspapers any extra, and even sit down as a household and watch the six or 10 o’clock information it’s more likely to be via social media.
He asks the questioner, who’s 17, the place he will get his information. The younger man says he’s an anomaly; he does watch the information on TV at 10pm. However his mates get information from TikTok, he says.
UPDATE: Starmer stated:
I’ve two teenage youngsters, my boy is 17 and my woman is 15. So I see this in the best way many, many mother and father do, with an actual sense of concern concerning the time that’s spent on social media, the content material that’s accessible on social media, the addictive nature of a whole lot of what’s occurring on social media, the best way it attracts youngsters in and takes away different features of their rising up …
I don’t suppose there’s a mum or dad within the nation who isn’t frightened about this, by the best way, I actually don’t.”
We as a authorities must be up there alongside mother and father, offering management and assist for them on the subject of social media, and we are going to now. We’ve already introduced that we’re going to do a session on banning social media for under-16s, and that can begin very quickly.
However I’m actually clear the established order, issues as they’re now, just isn’t adequate. No one could make the argument that issues could be left as they’re. They’ll’t, they’re not protecting of youngsters, and we intend to behave.
Starmer restates name for apprenticeships to be extra revered, saying ministers should not simply prioritise excessive achievers
Keir Starmer is talking at an occasion this morning in south-west London. Sky Information has dwell footage.
He says he desires each youngster to go so far as their expertise will take them.
However it doesn’t at all times work like that, he says.
He says he was the primary individual in his household to go to school.
However the system didn’t work for his brother, who had difficulties studying, he says.
He says the federal government will combat for these folks. It wants to point out that it’s on their aspect.
He was fast-tracked throught the system to get to school. He went from a village on the Surrey-Kent border and went to school in Leeds, which set him up for a profession within the regulation.
However the system didn’t work for his brother. He needed to combat every single day to get what he wanted.
He says his dad used to inform Starmer that he was doing no higher than his brother, Nick. He wished to instill in Starmer the assumption that he and his brother have been of equal value.
Starmer says the federal government is selling apprenticeships.
However he says that, though folks declare that apprentices are of equal worth to levels, folks don’t actually imagine that.
He says he desires to alter that.
Kendall suggests having annual debates in parliament updating web security legal guidelines as a result of ‘expertise altering so quick’
In her interviews this morning Liz Kendall, the expertise secretary, stated that parliament ought to discover a method of updating web security laws way more shortly than occurs now.
She stated MPs first began discussing the On-line Security Act in 2017, six years earlier than it lastly grew to become regulation. “That course of is method too lengthy, as a result of the expertise is altering so shortly,” she instructed the At this time programme.
She stated, simply as MPs debate a finance invoice yearly after the finances to replace tax legal guidelines, “I feel we’ve bought to suppose way more like that with expertise as a result of it’s altering so quick.”
Cupboard Workplace ‘trying into’ how Labour thinktank commissioned investigation into journalists, Kendall says
In her interviews this morning Liz Kendall, the expertise secretary, was additionally requested concerning the controversy concerning the Labour Collectively thinktank that commissioned a report that made “baseless claims” about journalists who have been invesigating it.
Kendall instructed Instances Radio that the Cupboard Workplace was “trying into” this. She stated:
The Cupboard Workplace is trying into the info of this difficulty. And I feel that’s proper as a result of the liberty of the press to ask tough questions, together with of cupboard ministers, is completely important. And the journalists in query, I do know, are extraordinarily good. They make our lives tough, however that’s their job.
The report was commissioned by Josh Simons, who was working Labour Collectively when the occasion was in opposition. He’s now a junior minister, working within the Cupboard Workplace and in Kendall’s Division for Science, Innovation and Expertise.
Requested if it was “tenable” for him to hold on as a minister, Kendall instructed the At this time programme: “He has welcomed the investigation, rightly so, by the regulatory physique, the physique accountable for regulating public affairs.”
Liz Kendall stresses session launch doesn’t imply full social media ban for under-16s is inevitable
Good morning. Parliament is in recess this week, however politics goes on, and the federal government an announcement about social media. The On-line Security Act, an unlimited piece of laws that was first proposed within the final decade and handed in 2023, is barely now totally coming into power. However already there are claims that it’s old-fashioned and, beneath strain from campaigners – and notably the Conservative occasion – the federal government final month introduced that it’s going to seek the advice of on the case for banning under-16s from social media. Australia has launched a ban of this type, and in nations around the globe governments are beneath rising strain to do the identical. The Tories are totally dedicated to a ban for under-16s, and not too long ago received a vote on this within the Lords.
At this time’s authorities “announcement” on social media is definitely three bulletins. There are defined on this information launch from No 10. They’re:
-
A loophole is being closed to make sure that materials produced by AI chatbots is roofed by On-line Security Act guidelines. When the act was being handed, AI chatbots weren’t extensively accessible. Robert Sales space has targeted on this in is in a single day Guardian story.
-
The federal government is committing to legislating now in order that, when its three-month session on a social media ban for under-16s wraps up later, if it decides it desires to alter the regulation, it will likely be ready to take action by way of secondary laws (ie shortly), with out having to attend for a brand new invoice. (That is broadly what the Labour MP Fred Thomas, who’s pushing for a ban on under-16s utilizing social media, was arguing for after the federal government misplaced the vote on this within the Lords final month.)
-
The federal government can be promising laws to make sure that, if a toddler dies and social media is deemed related, that content material will get preserved, not wiped. Campaigners seek advice from this as Jool’s regulation.
Anybody following the best way this debate has developed at Westminster over the previous yr might imagine {that a} social media ban for under-16s is inevitable. Inside months, the federal government has gone from saying a ban could be unworkable to sounding on the verge of implementing one.
However, in interviews this morning, Liz Kendall, the expertise secretary, harassed that this was not a completed deal. She instructed the At this time programme:
We do suppose it’s proper to have a session on whether or not or to not ban social media for the under-16s
Plenty of folks have made up their minds, Lord Nash (the Tory peer who tabled the modification that led to the federal government defeat in January) included.
However let me simply say this. There are organisations, together with the NSPCC and the Molly Rose Basis and the Web Watch Basis, who’re frightened {that a} ban wouldn’t resolve the issue as a result of it will simply power some of these items deeper [into the dark web], that the kids would attempt to get round it, that it will create a cliff edge at 16.
So I feel it’s the proper and accountable factor to do to have a session.
I’ll publish extra from Kendall’s interviews quickly.
Due to recess, there’s not a lot within the diary for at the moment. These are the occasions we find out about.
Morning: Keir Starmer is anticipated to document a clip for broadcasters.
11.30am: Downing Road holds a foyer briefing.
4pm: Nigel Farage, the Reform UK chief, holds a press occasion in Romford, forward of a rally later within the night. Farage will probably be with Andrew Rosindell MP and “particular friends”.
If you wish to contact me, please publish a message under the road when feedback are open (between 10am and 3pm), or message me on social media. I can’t learn all of the messages BTL, however for those who put “Andrew” in a message aimed toward me, I’m extra more likely to see it as a result of I seek for posts containing that phrase.
If you wish to flag one thing up urgently, it’s best to make use of social media. You possibly can attain me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, however particular person Guardian journalists are there, I nonetheless have my account, and for those who message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I’ll see it and reply if mandatory.
I discover it very useful when readers level out errors, even minor typos. No error is simply too small to right. And I discover your questions very attention-grabbing too. I can’t promise to answer to all of them, however I’ll attempt to reply to as many as I can, both BTL or generally within the weblog.