
Take a look at our newest merchandise
Key occasions
Reeves performs down significance of digital ID card U-turn, saying employees will nonetheless should confirm ID digitally
Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, has accused the media of exaggerating the extent of the digital ID U-turn.
In an interview on BBC Breakfast this morning, she mentioned:
On the digital ID, for starters, I do suppose this story has been a bit overwritten.
We’re saying that you’ll want necessary digital ID to have the ability to work within the UK.
Now the distinction is whether or not that needs to be one piece of ID, a digital ID card, or whether or not it may very well be an e-visa or an e-passport, and we’re fairly relaxed about what type that takes …
I don’t suppose most individuals thoughts whether or not it’s one piece of digital ID or a type of digital ID that may be verified.
When it was put to her that repeated U-turns undermined confidence within the authorities, she replied:
The important thing factor is the place you’re making an attempt to go. Our authorities, this authorities, our focus is on rising the financial system and bettering residing requirements for working folks.
Blunkett says he’s ‘dissatisfied’ by digital ID U-turn, and blames Starmer for lack of ‘strategic plan’ to defend coverage
On the Right now programme David Blunkett, a Labour dwelling secretary underneath Tony Blair and a robust supporter of ID playing cards, mentioned he was dissatisfied however not stunned by the digitial ID U-turn. Blunkett mentioned.
I’m dissatisfied, however I’m not stunned.
I’m not stunned as a result of the unique announcement was not adopted by a story or supportive statements or any form of strategic plan which concerned different ministers and those that are dedicated to this truly making the case.
And, as a consequence, those that are against the scheme for every kind of nefarious and really totally different causes – a few of them inexplicable – have been capable of mobilise public opinion and to get the web opposition to it up and working.
So, very sadly, it’s a sign of a failure to have the ability to enunciate why this coverage mattered, to have the ability to comply with by with a element of how it could work, after which to bolster that by a plan and communication of motion.
And, if you didn’t do all these issues, it’s not stunning in the long run, this factor runs into the sand.
Blunkett is correct to say that Keir Starmer introduced plans for digital ID (playing cards weren’t a part of it – regardless of the scheme frequently being described in these phrases) in a reasonably haphazard method. Digital ID was not in Labour’s manifesto. Starmer introduced the proposal in a shock speech final autumn, simply earlier than Labour’s convention. He offered it as a significant change. However the next week, in his convention speech, he didn’t point out it, and he didn’t construct help for it within the get together.
No less than, when he introduced the plan, it was common. However then public help for it collapsed, resulting in claims that Starmer had a “reverse Midas contact”, as Eleni Courea reported on the time. In October she wrote:
Internet help for digital ID playing cards fell from 35% within the early summer season to -14% on the weekend after Starmer’s announcement, in line with polling by Extra in Widespread.
The findings recommend that the proposal has suffered significantly from its affiliation with an unpopular authorities. In June, 53% of voters surveyed mentioned they have been in favour of digital ID playing cards for all Britons, whereas 19% have been opposed.
Tories and Lib Dems criticise Starmer’s ‘spinelessness’ after U-turn on digital ID
Good morning. Keir Starmer has carried out one other U-turn – on obligatory digital ID. Right here is Peter Walker and Pippa Crerar’s in a single day story.
Just a few days in the past Noah Keate from Politico listed seven main U-turns the federal government has already carried out. Right now’s information takes that tally to eight, though, should you have been being harsh, you can most likely discover extra, as a result of authorities all the time includes adjusting to circumstances, and so plans all the time change. However these a giant, correct U-turns, within the common which means of the phrase as utilized to politics – vital reversals on signature coverage.
U-turns usually permit the opposition to get pleasure from saying ‘we advised you so’, and there was a whole lot of that in a single day. That is from Kemi Badenoch.
The Prime Minister is ‘turning the nook’…straight into one other u-turn.
Good riddance. It was a horrible coverage anyway.
That is from her shadow Cupboard Workplace minister Mike Wooden.
Whereas we welcome the scrapping of any necessary identification, that is yet one more humiliating U-turn from the federal government. Keir Starmer’s spinelessness is turning into a sample, not an exception.
What was offered as a tricky measure to deal with unlawful working is now set to develop into yet one more expensive, ill-thought-out experiment deserted on the first signal of stress from Labour’s backbenches.
And that is from Lisa Good, the Lib Dem Cupboard Workplace spokesperson.
Quantity 10 have to be bulk ordering movement illness tablets at this price to deal with all their U-turns.
It was clear proper from the beginning this was a proposal doomed to failure, that may have value obscene quantities of taxpayers cash to ship completely nothing.
The political debate in regards to the deserves or in any other case of this was captured final in a very good alternate of tweets (Bluesky tweets) between my colleague Pippa Crerar and Sam Freedman, the Remark is Freed substacker and coverage skilled. At first of a thread, Pippa mentioned:
Bear in mind Lynton Crosby’s “barnacles off the boat” technique? At 2010 and 2015 elections the Tories efficiently shed unpopular insurance policies and perceptions that hindered their electoral enchantment. As a substitute, they centered on core messages they believed would assist win over floating voters. It labored.
That is the argument utilized by governments of all form down the ages to justify U-turns – take the short-term hit, as a result of in the long term you might be higher off should you ditch an unpopular coverage.
However Freedman, replying to this submit, mentioned:
Sadly to make this technique work you want a ship.
By this he means there is no such thing as a level Starmer ditching his unpopular insurance policies if no-one is aware of what his core, common ones are.
Starmer would argue he has bought a ship; he defined it to cupboard yesterday, lowering the price of residing. However Labour MPs concern that voters both haven’t bought the message, or aren’t impressed by it.
Right here is the agenda for the day.
Midday: Keir Starmer faces Kemi Badenoch at PMQs.
After 12.30pm: Shabana Mahmood, the house secretary, makes an announcement to MPs about West Midlands police and their help for Maccabi Tel Aviv followers being banned from the match in opposition to Aston Villa final 12 months. She is going to current the outcomes of an inquiry by the police inspectorate into how WMP justified the choice. Craig Guildford, the chief constable, has been accused of giving deceptive data to MPs in regards to the intelligence used to justify the choice, and, though Mahmood doesn’t hhiave the facility to sack Guildford, there’s hypothesis she’s going to says she not has confidence in him.
2pm: Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, will verify plans to revive the Northern Powerhouse Rail venture at an occasion in Leeds.
If you wish to contact me, please submit a message beneath the road when feedback are open (between 10am and 3pm), or message me on social media. I can’t learn all of the messages BTL, however should you put “Andrew” in a message aimed toward me, I’m extra more likely to see it as a result of I seek for posts containing that phrase.
If you wish to flag one thing up urgently, it’s best to make use of social media. You’ll be able to attain me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, however particular person Guardian journalists are there, I nonetheless have my account, and should you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I’ll see it and reply if obligatory.
I discover it very useful when readers level out errors, even minor typos. No error is simply too small to appropriate. And I discover your questions very fascinating too. I can’t promise to answer to all of them, however I’ll attempt to reply to as many as I can, both BTL or typically within the weblog.